A zoo in China has caused outrage by selling tiger urine as a cure for rheumatism. This unusual claim has drawn global criticism, especially from wildlife conservationists and health experts, who argue that it lacks ethical and scientific justification.

The zoo promoted bottled tiger urine as a remedy for joint pain and other ailments. However, this practice has sparked backlash for exploiting tigers, an already endangered species, for commercial gain. Wildlife advocates stress that such actions perpetuate harmful myths about the medicinal value of tiger products, encouraging illegal wildlife trade and endangering the species further.

Medical experts have also criticized the claim. There is no scientific evidence to support the effectiveness of tiger urine in treating rheumatism or any other condition. Experts warn that unproven remedies like this could mislead people and potentially harm their health.

This incident has reignited debates about the ethical use of animals in traditional medicine. While cultural beliefs often hold historical significance, many argue that these practices must evolve to align with modern conservation efforts and ethical standards.

The zoo’s actions have prompted calls for stricter regulations on wildlife exploitation. Conservationists urge governments and organizations to promote awareness campaigns that debunk myths surrounding animal-derived products. Stronger laws and public education could help protect endangered animals while discouraging unethical and unscientific practices.

In response to the backlash, the zoo has faced demands to cease the sale of tiger urine and focus on protecting wildlife. This case underscores the urgent need for a balance between preserving cultural traditions and ensuring the survival of vulnerable species.